Reward capping

Concrete Problems in AI Safetyintroduced

A proposed remedy that bounds the maximum achievable reward to blunt extreme, low-probability, high-payoff reward-hacking strategies.

If the largest possible reward is modest, an extreme, unlikely exploit stops being worth finding. Reward capping simply bounds the payoff -- the plainest of the paper's remedies for reward hacking.

How a cap blunts low-probability, high-payoff hacks is one half of the page; admitting the class of hack no cap can touch is the other. Multiple rewards, a remedy that shares the very same blind spot, is the natural next stop.

Bounding the payoff of a hack

Reward capping is Concrete Problems' simplest proposed remedy for Reward hacking (avoiding): bound the maximum achievable reward so that extreme, low-probability, high-payoff exploits stop being worth finding (concrete-problems, §"Reward Capping:", p. 10). The paper flags a real subtlety in implementing even this simple idea: the correct cap may need to apply to total accumulated reward rather than reward per timestep, since an agent operating over a long horizon can otherwise accumulate an uncapped total from many small capped steps.

What it can't touch

The paper states its own limitation directly: capping "can prevent extreme low-probability, high-payoff strategies," but "can't prevent strategies like the cleaning robot closing its eyes to avoid seeing dirt" (concrete-problems, §"Reward Capping:", p. 10), because that strategy never chases an extreme value at all, it cheaply satisfies a low bar. Reward capping — shares a blind spot with → Multiple rewards shows this is the identical limitation that affects Multiple rewards viewed from another angle: redundant reward implementations and a capped payoff both fail against the same eyes-closing hack if the underlying measurement itself, rather than the reward value, is what gets degraded. Reward capping belongs to Non-adversarial engineering fixes for reward hacking, the family of conventional-engineering fixes that work statistically rather than structurally.